Главная страница


ru.unix.bsd

 
 - RU.UNIX.BSD ------------------------------------------------------------------
 From : Valentin Nechayev                    2:5020/400     08 Jul 2004  09:38:10
 To : Spartak Radchenko
 Subject : Re: mail & RFC
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 >>> Spartak Radchenko wrote: 
 
  vs>>> Прямой запрет есть, но на него все клали. В RFC821.
  vs>>> 5.2.2  Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
 DM>> Мимо. Это про CNAME на MX а не про MX на CNAME.
 SR> Кстати, да. А я даже не посмотрел. Так есть ли где-нибудь явный
 SR> запрет прописывать в качестве MX CNAME? Я пока не нашёл.
 
 RFC974 (собственно описание для чего делаются MX'ы):
 
 ==={{{
    Note that the algorithm to delete irrelevant RRs breaks if LOCAL has
    a alias and the alias is listed in the MX records for REMOTE.  (E.g.
    REMOTE has an MX of ALIAS, where ALIAS has a CNAME of LOCAL).  This
    can be avoided if aliases are never used in the data section of MX
    RRs.
 ===}}}
 
 RFC1912:
 
 ==={{{
    Don't use CNAMEs in combination with RRs which point to other names
    like MX, CNAME, PTR and NS.  (PTR is an exception if you want to
    implement classless in-addr delegation.)  For example, this is
    strongly discouraged:
 
            podunk.xx.      IN      MX      mailhost
            mailhost        IN      CNAME   mary
            mary            IN      A       1.2.3.4
 
    [RFC 1034] in section 3.6.2 says this should not be done, and [RFC
    974] explicitly states that MX records shall not point to an alias
    defined by a CNAME.  This results in unnecessary indirection in
    accessing the data, and DNS resolvers and servers need to work more
    to get the answer.  If you really want to do this, you can accomplish
    the same thing by using a preprocessor such as m4 on your host files.
 ===}}}
 
 RFC1034 (он же STD13):
 
 ==={{{
 Domain names in RRs which point at another name should always point at
 the primary name and not the alias.  This avoids extra indirections in
 accessing information.  For example, the address to name RR for the
 above host should be:
 ===}}}
 -netch-
 --- ifmail v.2.15dev5.3
  * Origin: Dark side of coredump (2:5020/400)
 
 

Вернуться к списку тем, сортированных по: возрастание даты  уменьшение даты  тема  автор 

 Тема:    Автор:    Дата:  
 mail & RFC   Michael Smirnov   07 Jul 2004 18:30:30 
 Re: mail & RFC   Andrew Filonov   07 Jul 2004 18:41:03 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   07 Jul 2004 19:10:06 
 Re: mail & RFC   vladimir.sharun@ukr.net   07 Jul 2004 19:18:14 
 Re: mail & RFC   Dmitry Miloserdov   07 Jul 2004 20:34:48 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   08 Jul 2004 00:01:15 
 Re: mail & RFC   Valentin Nechayev   08 Jul 2004 09:38:10 
 Re: mail & RFC   Dmitry Miloserdov   08 Jul 2004 14:12:31 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   07 Jul 2004 20:02:48 
 Re: mail & RFC   Mykola Dzham   07 Jul 2004 23:05:53 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   07 Jul 2004 23:58:06 
 Re: mail & RFC   Valentin Nechayev   08 Jul 2004 09:38:09 
 Re: mail & RFC   vladimir.sharun@ukr.net   07 Jul 2004 21:23:39 
 Re: mail & RFC   Valentin Nechayev   08 Jul 2004 09:41:19 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   08 Jul 2004 09:52:37 
 Re: mail & RFC   Valentin Nechayev   09 Jul 2004 00:37:57 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   09 Jul 2004 01:39:15 
 Re: mail & RFC   Valentin Nechayev   09 Jul 2004 11:48:20 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   09 Jul 2004 12:13:03 
 Re: mail & RFC   Dmitry Miloserdov   09 Jul 2004 14:58:00 
 Re: mail & RFC   Valentin Nechayev   11 Jul 2004 15:03:01 
 Re: mail & RFC   Dmitry Miloserdov   07 Jul 2004 19:27:56 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   07 Jul 2004 20:09:00 
 Re: mail & RFC   Spartak Radchenko   07 Jul 2004 20:10:35 
 Re: mail & RFC   Michael Smirnov   07 Jul 2004 19:46:06 
 Re: mail & RFC   Valentin Nechayev   08 Jul 2004 09:44:54 
Архивное /ru.unix.bsd/22383e9483da3.html, оценка 2 из 5, голосов 10
Яндекс.Метрика
Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional