|
|
ru.unix.bsd- RU.UNIX.BSD ------------------------------------------------------------------ From : Pavel Pokrovsky 2:5080/191 24 Nov 2000 23:47:16 To : Peter Didenko Subject : DHCP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AK>>> Как мне быть с сабж сервером? AK>>> Где взять, как настроить? первый вопрос гораздо актуальнее AK>>> второго. PP>> чтоб посвежее - www.isc.org, там же по втоpомy вопpосy. PD> Кстати, про ISC и BIND. Hашлась вот такая статеечка :) PD> http://www.LinuxSecurity.com/feature_stories/conrad_vixie-1.html :) Paul Vixie and David Conrad on BINDv9 and Internet Security By Dave Wreski 10/3/2000 7:54 LinuxSecurity.com: Do you think Linux has a place in the data center as a secure platform for commerce in the state that it's currently in? What do you think needs to change with regards to security and Linux? Are there any root servers that run Linux or other Open Source platforms? Paul Vixie: Some versions of Linux have become remarkably mature in the last few years. Now that there's a growing stable of companies providing commercial support, I think we'll see Linux become a respected component of enterprise information management strategies alongside BSD/OS and FreeBSD. Both Linux and BSD have already proven their strengths in the front end, and when they filter out to the back end I think we'll see the end of the historic ABI/API captivity strategies of the big iron vendors, not to mention Microsoft. I also note that Mac OS X is BSD-based. This means we've finally gotten our point across, and open source is viable in both the long and immediate term. David Conrad: Linux most assuredly currently has a place in the data center as a secure platform for commerce. There is a fine line to be drawn between usability and security. I personally feel that Linux (or rather, the popular distributions) may err on the side of allowing too many applications and services to exist and/or default to on. From my experience, it is difficult to fully audit contributed code (the BIND v8.2 & v8.2.1 NXT bug that has caused such difficulties was a result of a bug in code donated to us, ironically enough, from a large firm that focuses on computer security) and Linux is, almost by definition, contributed code (from FSF, ISC, etc.). Simplifying distributions would probably tend to increase security (while possibly decreasing usability, at least for somebody). >Each root server operator makes their own decision about what >architecture/OS/nameserver is used. None that I'm aware of run Linux. A >couple run FreeBSD, I believe. LinuxSecurity.com: What are some of the biggest challenges you face when dealing with security? Paul Vixie: No comment comes to mind. David Conrad: The complexity of the recent IETF standards results in a lot of complexity in the code which increases the potential for bugs (security related or otherwise). Standards bloat, in combination with feeping creaturism demanded of us by our funders or users, results in software bloat which is probably our most significant challenge. That's it... --- Golded 1.1.4.5 * Origin: suicide is painless, it brings on many changes (2:5080/191) Вернуться к списку тем, сортированных по: возрастание даты уменьшение даты тема автор
Архивное /ru.unix.bsd/22943a1eaa9e.html, оценка из 5, голосов 10
|