ru.unix.bsd

 
 - RU.UNIX.BSD ------------------------------------------------------------------
 From : Sergey Mikhnenkov                    2:5090/22      14 Jun 2003  14:33:14
 To : All
 Subject : Windows 2003 PDC + samba
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 

 
 Если вдруг кто-то уже долго мучается, как я запихивая самбу в домен Win2003,
 рекомендую почитать вот это:
 
 > So, W2K doesn't need SMB-packets signatures and we have no problems, but
 > we
 > want it to work with Windows 2003. What's the difference between Windows
 > 2000
 > and Windows 2003 when it comes to security signatures of SMB-packets?
 
 By default, a Windows Server 2003 requires signature of SMB packets (at
 least, a Windows Server 2003 DC).
 
 > Can we disable signatures in Windows 2003 Server or do we have to make
 > some changes in Red Hat/Samba? Is ther another way to get around this
 > problem?
 
 Yes, you can look for the following security option
 
 Microsoft network server: Digitally sign commnunications (always) :
 
 and set it to Disabled, instead of Enabled.
 
 This security option modifies the following registry value:
 
 Key: HKLM\SYSTEM\CCS\Service\lanmanserver\parameters\
 Value: RequireSecuritySignature
 Content: 0 to disable, 1 to enable
 
 If you don't want to reboot after that change, you can stop the srv.sys
 driver and services that depend on it using the following command:
 
 C:\>net stop srv
 
 Then, you can restart it, as well as the services that depend on it
 (in particular, netlogon)
 
 C:\>net start srv
 
 Jean-Baptiste Marchand
 А может кто уже патчик сделал, чтобы не изращаться, а сновыми требования по
 безопасности работало ?
 
                                               Sergey.
 --- И чего это я тебя так ненавижу ?
  * Origin: За что боролись, на то и напоролись ! (2:5090/22)
 
 

Вернуться к списку тем, сортированных по: возрастание даты  уменьшение даты  тема  автор