|
|
ru.linux- RU.LINUX --------------------------------------------------------------------- From : Sergey Lentsov 2:4615/71.10 03 Jan 2002 18:20:38 To : All Subject : URL: http://www.lwn.net/2002/0103/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1][LWN Logo]
[2]Click Here
[LWN.net]
Bringing you the latest news from the Linux World.
Dedicated to keeping Linux users up-to-date, with concise news for all
interests
Sections:
Main page
[3]Security
[4]Kernel
[5]Distributions
[6]Development
[7]Commerce
[8]Linux in the news
[9]Announcements
[10]Linux History
[11]Letters
[12]All in one big page
Other LWN stuff:
[13]Daily Updates
[14]Calendar
[15]Linux Stocks Page
[16]Book reviews
[17]Penguin Gallery
[18]Archives/search
[19]Use LWN headlines
[20]Contact us
TUCOWS.com:
[21]linux.tucows.com
[22]Ext2
[23]Themes
Recent features:
- [24]2001 Timeline
- [25]O'Reilly Open Source Conference
- [26]OLS 2001
- [27]Gael Duval
- [28]Kernel Summit
- [29]Singapore Linux Conference
- [30]djbdns
Here is the [31]permanent site for this page.
See also: [32]last week's LWN.
Leading items and editorials
UCITA is back. LWN's first report on an attempt to rework U.S.
software licensing law appeared in [33]April, 1998. The process, then
known as "UCC 2B," since renamed "UCITA," is currently stalled. Only
two states have passed (modified) versions of the code, and few others
have shown any interest at all.
Recently, the law's drafting committee held a meeting to try to
resurrect UCITA. The resulting amendments are described in [34]this
posting from long-time UCITA critic Cem Kaner. It makes for
interesting reading.
Certain aspects of UCITA, such as the "self help" provision that would
allow vendors to shut down software remotely, have been cleaned up.
UCITA no longer allows vendor back doors, thus closing off one obvious
source of problems and security holes. In theory, the provisions
allowing vendors to forbid public criticism of their software have
been removed. As Mr. Kaner points out, though, a huge loophole
remains.
For the free software community, however, the most interesting
provisions are likely to be those having to do with warranties and
liability. On the surface, the refurbished UCITA allows the disclaimer
of warranties on free software. The situation is not as good as it
seems, however:
* UCITA uses a "free beer" definition of free software. Thus, for
example, Internet Explorer is free software under this code.
* Warranty disclaimers are not allowed when the user is a "consumer"
(i.e. not a business).
As a result, Microsoft can avoid providing any kind of warranty for
much of its business software. On the other hand, free software
providers can not disclaim warranties to consumer end users. This
opens up free software developers (and those who distribute their
code) to consumer lawsuits. Linux on the desktop will not be helped by
this provision.
So, the UCITA battle will have to be fought yet again, on a
state-by-state basis. The alternative is the prospect of free software
being forced off the net (or, at least, out of the U.S.) with implied
warranties that nobody was ever paid to back up.
What does 2002 hold for Linux? One of the privileges of editing a
publication is the ability to put out annual lists of dubious
predictions. LWN is not immune to the attraction of pretending that we
know more than anybody else, so here goes. The following stuff might
actually happen this year. Or it might not.
* Linux systems will suffer a major security incident with
significant costs to those affected. Names like "Code Red,"
"Nimda," and "Sircam" inspire disdain and amusement among Linux
users. But, while our systems are generally more secure, we do not
have an absolute solution to security problems. Sooner or later,
we will get bitten too.
* We will lose a major distributor to bankruptcy, merger, or
acquisition. Consolidation in the distributor market has been
predicted for some time, but the distributors have proved
remarkably resilient. There are limits to resilience, however, and
at least one distributor is likely to find out where those limits
are. No, we will not try to predict which one.
* Workable free software business models will begin to emerge. The
Bubble Days distracted Linux businesses from the vital task of
actually making money for a while, but those days have been gone
for a while now. With no alternative, some businesses will
actually figure out a way to survive.
* Desktop Linux will be taken far more seriously by the end of the
year. Over the last year, an impressive array of desktop tools
have reached a stable state: consider Galeon (and, of course,
Mozilla, upon which Galeon is based), Konqueror, GnuCash,
Nautilus, Evolution, and, of course, the KDE and GNOME desktop
environments in general. 2002 will see the stabilization of a
number of office productivity tools, such as KOffice, OpenOffice,
Gnumeric, and AbiWord. At that point, the Linux desktop will have
almost everything needed by a large number of desktop users. More
specialized applications will take years to fill in, but the
basics are coming into place.
* The legal situation will get murkier. A high-level U.S. court
ruling against the DMCA is possible; chances are good, however,
that we will have another Dmitry Sklyarov to defend.
* Alternative kernel trees will grow in importance. Linus Torvalds
will continue to set the general developmental direction, but,
increasingly, the kernels that people actually run will be
produced by somebody else.
Remember, these predictions are offered under the terms of the Free
Forward-Looking Handwaving License (FFLHL), and NO WARRANTY of any
type is implied regarding their veracity or whether they make sense at
all.
The LWN.net 2001 Linux Timeline, final version. We are, perhaps,
better at looking backward. So, with pleasure, we announce that the
final version of the [35]LWN.net 2001 Linux Timeline is now available.
Thanks to all of you who offered comments on the previous versions.
Inside this LWN.net weekly edition:
* [36]Security: Microsoft's security bugs; exploitable mutt problem;
glibc updates
* [37]Kernel: 2.5.2 scheduler changes; development process issues;
waiting for kbuild.
* [38]Distributions: Distributions in Review - Part 2; DutNux.
* [39]Development: KDE 3.0 beta 1, Ogg Vorbis RC3, P2P Topologies,
Gnumeric 1.0.0, Bluefish 0.7, DotGNU yearly review, GCC 3.0.3,
Jython 2.1, XML issues.
* [40]Commerce: News from ActiveState; Creatures Internet Edition
now shipping.
* [41]History: Linux on PowerPC; mirrors for the kernel; Y2K.
* [42]Letters: Galeon installation; SourceForge; U.K. and open
source.
...plus the usual array of reports, updates, and announcements.
This Week's LWN was brought to you by:
* [43]Jonathan Corbet, Executive Editor
January 3, 2002
[44]Click Here
[45]Click Here
[46]Next: Security
[47]Eklektix, Inc. Linux powered! Copyright Л 2002 [48]Eklektix, Inc.,
all rights reserved
Linux (R) is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
References
1. http://lwn.net/
2. http://ads.tucows.com/click.ng/pageid=001-012-132-000-000-001-000-000-012
3. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/security.php3
4. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/kernel.php3
5. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/dists.php3
6. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/devel.php3
7. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/commerce.php3
8. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/press.php3
9. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/announce.php3
10. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/history.php3
11. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/letters.php3
12. http://lwn.net//2002/0103/bigpage.php3
13. http://lwn.net/daily/
14. http://linuxcalendar.com/
15. http://lwn.net/stocks/
16. http://lwn.net/Reviews/
17. http://lwn.net/Gallery/
18. http://lwn.net/archives/
19. http://lwn.net/op/headlines.phtml
20. http://lwn.net/op/Contact.html
21. http://linux.tucows.com/
22. http://news.tucows.com/ext2/
23. http://unixthemes.tucows.com/
24. http://lwn.net/2001/features/Timeline/
25. http://lwn.net/2001/features/oreilly2001/
26. http://lwn.net/2001/features/OLS/
27. http://lwn.net/2001/features/MandrakeSoft.php3
28. http://lwn.net/2001/features/KernelSummit/
29. http://lwn.net/2001/features/Singapore
30. http://lwn.net/2001/features/djbdns.php3
31. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/
32. http://lwn.net/2001/1220/
33. http://lwn.net/1998/0430
34.
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200112/msg00255.ht
ml
35. http://lwn.net/2001/features/Timeline/
36. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/security.php3
37. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/kernel.php3
38. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/dists.php3
39. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/devel.php3
40. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/commerce.php3
41. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/history.php3
42. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/letters.php3
43. mailto:lwn@lwn.net
44. http://ads.tucows.com/click.ng/buttonpos=lwnbutton125top
45. http://ads.tucows.com/click.ng/buttonpos=125-001-016
46. http://lwn.net/2002/0103/security.php3
47. http://www.eklektix.com/
48. http://www.eklektix.com/
--- ifmail v.2.14.os7-aks1
* Origin: Unknown (2:4615/71.10@fidonet)
Вернуться к списку тем, сортированных по: возрастание даты уменьшение даты тема автор
Архивное /ru.linux/198618e6cc46c.html, оценка из 5, голосов 10
|